This paper experimentally tests the relation between subjects’ competitiveness and bargaining behavior. Bargaining is investigated in a demand-ultimatum game, where the responder can request a share of the pie from the proposer. The re-sults show that highly competitive proposers earn less, since they make lower offers, which are more often rejected. Similarly, highly competitive responders achieve lower payoffs, since they request excessive amounts which induces lower proposals. These findings establish a link between competitiveness and bargaining as suggested by social and evolutionary psychology. Thus, we identify one driver of the empirical heterogeneity of bargaining behavior and outcomes. From a management perspec-tive our findings highlight that giving thought to employees’ competitiveness before delegating them to participate in negotiations may pay off.


 



Voir le document

Dernières publications

2018s-25 CS
A Large Canadian Database for Macroeconomic Analysis
Olivier Fortin-Gagnon, Maxime Leroux, Dalibor Stevanovic et Stéphane Surprenant
Voir le document

2018s-24 CS
A Laboratory Study of the Effect of Financial Literacy Training on Retirement Savings
Dina Tasneem, Audrey Azerot, Marine de Montaignac et Jim Engle-Warnick
Voir le document

2018s-23 CS
A Laboratory Study of Nudge with Retirement Savings
Dina Tasneem, Audrey Azerot, Marine de Montaignac et Jim Engle-Warnick
Voir le document

2018s-22 CS
Decision Rules for Precautionary and Retirement Savings
Dina Tasneem et Jim Engle-Warnick
Voir le document


Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en analyse des organisations
1130 rue Sherbrooke Ouest, suite 1400
Montréal, Québec (Canada) H3A 2M8
(514) 985-4000
(514) 985-4039
reception@cirano.qc.ca

© 2018 CIRANO. Tous droits réservés.



Partenaire de :