We present a decision-making experiment, conducted in the field, that explores the extent to which reduction of ambiguity can be a public good. We find evidence that people with a preference to avoid ambiguity contribute to the public good. We find that risk averse people free-ride. Cheap talk erases the predictability of who free rides, but does not affect the overall public good provision, either in a positive or a negative direction. Finally, we find that people draw appropriate inference from the evidence that the public good provides. We relate our findings to the issue of new technology adoption.

Voir le document

Dernières publications

2018s-43 CS
Tradable Climate Liabilities: A Thought Experiment
Étienne Billette de Villemeur et Justin Leroux
Voir le document

2018s-42 CS
Playing with Fire? Debt near Retirement in Canada
Nicolas Bédard et Pierre-Carl Michaud
Voir le document

2018s-41 CS
The Effect of College Education on Health and Mortality: Evidence from Canada
Guy Lacroix, François Laliberté-Auger, Pierre-Carl Michaud et Daniel Parent
Voir le document

2018s-39 CS
The Ins and Outs of Involuntary Part-time Employment
Daniel Borowczyk-Martins et Etienne Lalé
Voir le document

Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en analyse des organisations
1130 rue Sherbrooke Ouest, suite 1400
Montréal, Québec (Canada) H3A 2M8
(514) 985-4000
(514) 985-4039

© 2019 CIRANO. Tous droits réservés.

Partenaire de :

Website Security Test