Several theoretical models and empirical results stress an unexpected all-or-nothing insurance behavior. Using experimental data of Corcos et al. (2017), who developed an extended version of Mossin’s traditional theoretical demand for insurance and provided non-parametric tests, this paper presents descriptive statistical analyses and econometric tests studying whether these experimental data comply with the all-or-nothing hypothesis. Our findings support this assumption for both risk averters and risk lovers. When this all-or-nothing behavior fails to meet Expected Utility predictions, it highlights a lack of responsiveness of individuals to insurance prices. When facing a more-than-actuarial insurance price, risk averters keep buying full insurance rather than partial insurance. A zero fixed cost holds risk lovers in the insurance market where they choose full instead of waive insurance. The bimodal nature of decisions might create an opportunity for the authority for driving people to enter the insurance market where they then buy full insurance.

Voir le document

Dernières publications

2018MO-02 MO
Baromètre CIRANO 2018 - La perception des risques au Québec
Ingrid Peignier et Nathalie de Marcellis-Warin
Voir le document

2018s-20 CS
Long-term Care Risk Misperceptions
M. Martin Boyer, Claude Fluet, Marie-Louise Leroux, Pierre-Carl Michaud et Philippe De Donder
Voir le document

2018RP-11 RP
The Value of Food Certification and Labels for Consumers in Québec (Canada)
Nathalie de Marcellis-Warin, Ingrid Peignier et Yoann Guntzburger
En savoir plus

Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en analyse des organisations
1130 rue Sherbrooke Ouest, suite 1400
Montréal, Québec (Canada) H3A 2M8
(514) 985-4000
(514) 985-4039

© 2018 CIRANO. Tous droits réservés.

Partenaire de :