This paper provides general theorems about the control that maximizes the mixed Bentham-Rawls (MBR) criterion for intergenerational justice, which was introduced in Alvarez-Cuadrado and Long (2009). We establish sufficient concavity conditions for a candidate trajectory to be optimal and unique. We show that the state variable is monotonic under rather weak conditions. We also prove that inequality among generations, captured by the gap between the poorest and the richest generations, is lower when optimization is performed under the MBR criterion rather than under the discounted utilitarian criterion. A quadratic example is also used to perform comparative static exercices: it turns out, in particular, that the larger the weight attributed to the maximin part of the MBR criterion, the better-off the less fortunate generations. All those properties are discussed and compared with those of the discounted utilitarian (DU, Koopmans 1960) and the rank-discounted utilitarian (RDU, Zuber and Asheim, 2012) criterions. We contend they are in line with some aspects of the rawlsian just savings principle.

Voir le document

Dernières publications

2018s-02 CS
The Logic of Collective Action Revisited
Jeannette Brosig-Koch, Timo Heinrich, Heike Hennig-Schmidt, Claudia Keser et Joachim Weimann
Voir le document

2018s-03 CS
Innovation in Humanitarian Supply Chains: A Systematic Review
Nezih Altay, Graham Heaslip, Gyöngyi Kovács, Karen Spens, Peter Tatham et Alain Vaillancourt
Voir le document

2018RP-06 RP
Adéquation des transferts aux besoins des municipalités. Quelques réflexions sur les enjeux d’équité et d’efficacité
Stéphanie Boulenger, Jean-Philippe Meloche, Brigitte Milord et François Vaillancourt
Voir le document

Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en analyse des organisations
1130 rue Sherbrooke Ouest, suite 1400
Montréal, Québec (Canada) H3A 2M8
(514) 985-4000
(514) 985-4039

© 2018 CIRANO. Tous droits réservés.

Partenaire de :