This paper discusses the problem of optimal design of a jurisdiction structure from the view point of a utilitarian social planner when individuals with identical utility functions for a non-rival public good and private consumption have private information about their contributive capacities. It shows that the superiority of a centralized provision of a non-rival public good over a federal one does not always hold. Specifically, when differences in individuals’ contributive capacities are large, it is better to provide the public good in several distinct jurisdictions rather than to pool these jurisdictions into a single one. In the specific situation where individuals have logarithmic utilities, the paper provides a complete characterization of the optimal jurisdiction structure in the two-type case.

 "C’est pour unir les avantages divers qui résultent de la grandeur et de la petitesse des nations que le fédératif a été créé." (Alexis de Toqueville)



Voir le document

Dernières publications

2018s-22 CS
Decision Rules for Precautionary and Retirement Savings
Dina Tasneem et Jim Engle-Warnick
Voir le document

2018MO-02 MO
Baromètre CIRANO 2018 - La perception des risques au Québec
Ingrid Peignier et Nathalie de Marcellis-Warin
Voir le document

2018s-20 CS
Long-term Care Risk Misperceptions
M. Martin Boyer, Claude Fluet, Marie-Louise Leroux, Pierre-Carl Michaud et Philippe De Donder
Voir le document

2018RP-11 RP
The Value of Food Certification and Labels for Consumers in Québec (Canada)
Nathalie de Marcellis-Warin, Ingrid Peignier et Yoann Guntzburger
En savoir plus


Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en analyse des organisations
1130 rue Sherbrooke Ouest, suite 1400
Montréal, Québec (Canada) H3A 2M8
(514) 985-4000
(514) 985-4039
reception@cirano.qc.ca

© 2018 CIRANO. Tous droits réservés.



Partenaire de :